Map Close  
Person info Close  
Information Close  
Source reference Close  
  Svenska
 
Index

Armenia

The Urartu Civilisation

Victory for Independence

Artashisian Dynasty on the Armenian Throne

Armenia caught between Rome and the Arsacids

The Acceptance of Christianity

Defending Christianity

Armenia Under the Bagratouni Dynasty

Cilicia - the New Armenia

Armenia Under Turanian Rule

The Renaissance or the Resurrection of Armenia

The Eastern Question

Russia in the Caucasus

The Armenian Question

Battle on Two Fronts

Tsarist Russia Against the Armenians

The Revolution of the Young Turks and the Armenian People on the Eve of World War I

The First World War

The Resurrection of Armenia

Armenia on the Road to Independence, 1918

- Armenia on the Road to Independence, 1918

Eastern Armenia

Western Armenia

"The Fateful Years" (1914-1917)

"Hopes and Emotions" (March-October, 1917)

The Bolshevik Revolution and Armenia

Transcaucasia Adrift (November, 1917

Dilemmas (March-April, 1918)

War and Independence (April-May, 1918)

The Republics of Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia

The Suppliants (June-October, 1918)

In conclusion

Soviet Armenia

The Second Independent Republic of Armenia

Epilogue

Previous page Page 134 Next page Smaller font Larger font Print friednly version  
The Armenian Civilization and Byzantine

Through this political relation of Armenia and Byzantine, the influence on other areas of Byzantine life was unavoidable.

The influence of Armenia and its participation in the art history of Byzantine forms one of the most interesting epochs in Armenia's art history. We have already mentioned the contribution of Armenia to the architecture of Byzantine, during the first golden artistic era, the 6th century. We have also described the theory of Strzygowski claiming that Armenia was the original source of Christian architecture in the East and in Byzantine.

In his famous work, Strzygowski writes: "An art historian must dispel the idea that the savage Armenians were civilized first by Rome and than Byzantine. In reality, the Armenians had their churches before the art of building churches in the vicinity of the Mediterranean had ever started to spread. This old Arian culture defended its dominance among these people which is why domed buildings are much more common there than those with right-angles, a building form which later spread to Europe."

We can also cite the famous Russian historian A. Vasiliev's words about the Macedonian dynasty, he thinks that this period, apart from the reign of Justinianus, was the most prominent era in Byzantine art, in regard to its creativity and its unique forms. He writes: "The Armenian influence during the Macedonian dynasty is significantly noticeable in Byzantine art. A large number of Armenian artists and architects worked in Byzantine." Vasiliev indicates that the new and famous church of Nea, which in Basil I's regin was the equivalent of the St Sophia Church during the reign of Justinianus, was probably built from an Armenian drawing. 92

Armenian influence on the Byzantine culture was not only limited to art but, extended also to the judicial system. Armenia contributed some of the greatest lawyers in Byzantine, who during the reign of Justinianus preserved the heritage of the Roman judicial system, and throughout the following centuries helped the empire to reorganize its judicial structure. 93

The interaction between Byzantine and Armenia, which developed over more than ten centuries, were not one-sided. Byzantine, which according to Villehardouin was the empire of all empires, did not only rule over the east during the Middle Ages, but was also an instructor in civilization.