Map Close  
Person info Close  
Information Close  
Source reference Close  
  Svenska
 
Index

Armenia

The Urartu Civilisation

Victory for Independence

Artashisian Dynasty on the Armenian Throne

Armenia caught between Rome and the Arsacids

The Acceptance of Christianity

Defending Christianity

Armenia Under the Bagratouni Dynasty

Cilicia - the New Armenia

Armenia Under Turanian Rule

The Renaissance or the Resurrection of Armenia

The Eastern Question

Russia in the Caucasus

The Armenian Question

Battle on Two Fronts

Tsarist Russia Against the Armenians

The Revolution of the Young Turks and the Armenian People on the Eve of World War I

The First World War

The Resurrection of Armenia

Armenia on the Road to Independence, 1918

- Armenia on the Road to Independence, 1918

Eastern Armenia

Western Armenia

"The Fateful Years" (1914-1917)

"Hopes and Emotions" (March-October, 1917)

The Bolshevik Revolution and Armenia

Transcaucasia Adrift (November, 1917

Dilemmas (March-April, 1918)

War and Independence (April-May, 1918)

The Republics of Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia

The Suppliants (June-October, 1918)

In conclusion

Soviet Armenia

The Second Independent Republic of Armenia

Epilogue

Previous page Page 431 Next page Smaller font Larger font Print friednly version  
On that evening the Seim assembled to confirm the proposed cabinet. The embarrassed Armenian members heard their names presented for approval. The historian who is unaware of what had transpired during the preceding three days might be deceived by the apparent unity in the Seim. The three great fractions joined to voice their approbation of the new government, which included four Georgians, five Moslems, and four Armenians. Almost to be expected was the fact that the Armenians ran a poor third in securing strategic and influential posts. The portfolios were distributed as follows: 41


Akaky Chkhenkeli Premier and Foreign Affairs
Noi Ramishvili Internal Affairs
Noi Khomeriki Agriculture
Grigory Georgadze War
&nbps;  
Fathali Khan Khoisky Justice
Khudadad Melik Aslanov Transportation
Nesib Usubbekov Enlightenment
Mahmed Hajinsky Trade and Industry
Ibrahim Haidarov State Control
   
Alexndre Khatisian Finance
Hovhannes Kachaznouni Welfare
Avetik Sahakian Provisions
Aramayis Erzinkian Labour

In his inaugural address, Chkhenkeli promised to guarantee the equality of all Transcaucasian citizens and to establish provincial boundaries within the Republic on the basis of mutual agreement and concessions. With obvious reference to the Baku Sovnarkom, he denounced dual government in Transcaucasia. To the applause of all except Dashnakists and Social Revolutionaries, Rasul-Zade stood solidly with Chkhenkeli. It was imperative that all Transcaucasia be welded into a single entity, with the neighbouring district of Daghestan being invited to join the Federation. 42 According to Armenian interpretation, what Rasul-Zade was advocating was the establishment of Moslem control in Baku and the strengthening of the Moslem plurality of Transcaucasia by the incorporation of the Mountaineers of Daghestan. Khatchatour Karjikian, as chairman of the fraction Dashnaktsoutiun, pledged support to Chkhenkeli's government but could not refrain from adding several remarks that echoed Tumanov's sizzling speech of four days earlier. He asked the Seim to recognise that the declaration of independence had been instigated under foreign pressure and that much of the public was unenthused and sceptical. Yet the crisis could be surmounted if the government inspired faith and loyalty by concluding an honourable peace and by appealing justice equally to all sections of Transcaucasia. 43

The polite remarks in the Seim did not satisfy the populace of Tiflis. The mobs continued to hurl insults at the traitorous government. On May 5, in an attempt to mollify the crowds, Chkhenkeli published a detailed report outlining the reasons for the fall of Kars. Included in the document were the opinions of military experts who testified that the fortress would have been unable to withstand an enemy assault. 44 The claim was unconvincing, however, for the public also knew of Nazarbekian's report to Tiflis that Kars could hold firm for at least a month and of Kars oblast Commissar Dsamoev's wire that the populace, prepared for a resolute defence, had been driven to panic by Chkhenkeli's order to evacuate. It was this order that led to the disastrous exodus and to the destruction of much of the city. 45